2 Comments
Commenting has been turned off for this post
Feb 10, 2022Liked by Citizen Doctor

Yes, what I'm suggesting, among other things, is that the Constitution is fake law. The right to insurrection was affirmed implicity by all parties who signed the Treaty of Paris (1783) and must therefore be regarded as unalienable. Anything which subverts the right of insurrection deserves to be called criminal.

It's by the way here that the British, too, need to respect this unalienable right throughout Great Britain and Northern Island. Since Canada is tied to the UK through the monarchy, Canadians inherit the right of insurrection. Australia, too.

Expand full comment
Feb 10, 2022Liked by Citizen Doctor

Thanks for the quotes. Interesting compilation.

Bankers' boy Alex Hamilton and the Funding Fathers were very clever guys. Imagine how much less criminal and less brutally expansionist their "empire" (Federalist No. 1, 1st paragraph) could have been...

• if they had written in their preamble that one objective was not merely to form "a more perfect Union", whatever that means, but to form a Federation of free and independent Republics

• if the Congress and the president had been deprived all power over every "Militia"

• if their allegedly "Federal" gov, as we call it now, had been deprived the power to borrow money or anything else

• if their allegedly "Federal" gov had been deprived the power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof

• of the previous two deprivations had been imposed on the States, too

• if the clause of Article VII as it stands today were simply omitted, because it has nothing to say about the law of "Ratification" or "Establishmemt" before its ratification and establishment

• if they had included the Bill of Ten Afterthoughts as Article VII, ​and

• if they had not criminalized insurrection, without which there'd have been no USA.

Expand full comment